<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The broken web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/</link>
	<description>Coding and the games industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 08:04:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-369</guid>
		<description>But hey! CSS 3 will support layout via ASCII art!

http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-layout/#rowheight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But hey! CSS 3 will support layout via ASCII art!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-layout/#rowheight" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-layout/#rowheight</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 01:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-368</guid>
		<description>Gabe da Silveira, I tried your CSS, and it doesn&#039;t match the table version presented.  Using the same HTML you presented, how do you make each of the three columns the same size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabe da Silveira, I tried your CSS, and it doesn&#8217;t match the table version presented.  Using the same HTML you presented, how do you make each of the three columns the same size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Wittens</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Wittens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-367</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s ridiculous to complain about CSS in 2010 without looking at the history behind it. The CSS specification has in fact moved on, and so have all the browsers, except for one: Internet Explorer.

CSS2, which became a W3C recommendation in 1998, gives you perfect equivalents of all the old-school HTML table layout modes, without all the crufty markup. All the alternative browsers have supported this for years. Microsoft waited until IE8. That means nobody can use it without hacks until IE7 has died, which will be several more years.

Floats and clears were never meant to do multi-column page layout; they were, surprisingly, intended for floating elements.

http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS2-20080411/

Point the finger at the party to blame, not at the web developers who have made lemonade out of the lemons they were given.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous to complain about CSS in 2010 without looking at the history behind it. The CSS specification has in fact moved on, and so have all the browsers, except for one: Internet Explorer.</p>
<p>CSS2, which became a W3C recommendation in 1998, gives you perfect equivalents of all the old-school HTML table layout modes, without all the crufty markup. All the alternative browsers have supported this for years. Microsoft waited until IE8. That means nobody can use it without hacks until IE7 has died, which will be several more years.</p>
<p>Floats and clears were never meant to do multi-column page layout; they were, surprisingly, intended for floating elements.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS2-20080411/" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-CSS2-20080411/</a></p>
<p>Point the finger at the party to blame, not at the web developers who have made lemonade out of the lemons they were given.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe da Silveira</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe da Silveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Okay here we go, the proper HTML from above:

&lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt;Column 1&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt;Column 2&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&gt;Column 3&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay here we go, the proper HTML from above:</p>
<p>&lt;div class=&#8221;column&#8221;&gt;Column 1&lt;/div&gt;<br />
&lt;div class=&#8221;column&#8221;&gt;Column 2&lt;/div&gt;<br />
&lt;div class=&#8221;column&#8221;&gt;Column 3&lt;/div&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe da Silveira</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe da Silveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-365</guid>
		<description>Trying again:

&gt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&lt;Column 1&gt;/div&lt;
&gt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&lt;Column 2&gt;/div&lt;
&gt;div class=&quot;column&quot;&lt;Column 3&gt;/div&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trying again:</p>
<p>&gt;div class=&#8221;column&#8221;&lt;Column 1&gt;/div&lt;<br />
&gt;div class=&#8221;column&#8221;&lt;Column 2&gt;/div&lt;<br />
&gt;div class=&#8221;column&#8221;&lt;Column 3&gt;/div&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe da Silveira</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe da Silveira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-364</guid>
		<description>What a ridiculous strawman you&#039;ve set up.  

A comparable CSS layout to what you&#039;ve specified in HTML is:

Column 1
Column 2
Column 3

.column { width: 33%; float: left }

CSS may seem pretty crude if you are a graphic designer who just wants to make something look pixel perfect.  However such a person would recognize that even something as simple as getting the right color on a printed design requires deep knowledge of CMYK, paper stocks, and printing techniques.

HTML/CSS are certainly not convenient for pixel precision.  However they do manage to be the first true multi-platform multi-media open content format that can be accessed by tens of thousands of different devices, can be used by both the deaf and the blind and all other populations.

That is no small achievement, and though many have proclaimed how much better they can do, no one has created an alternative that gained any traction whatsoever.  So, if you want to do web design, maybe you should actually learn how it works, rather than writing banal rants demonstrating your own ignorance and utter disregard for the people who actually created the future you are now enjoying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a ridiculous strawman you&#8217;ve set up.  </p>
<p>A comparable CSS layout to what you&#8217;ve specified in HTML is:</p>
<p>Column 1<br />
Column 2<br />
Column 3</p>
<p>.column { width: 33%; float: left }</p>
<p>CSS may seem pretty crude if you are a graphic designer who just wants to make something look pixel perfect.  However such a person would recognize that even something as simple as getting the right color on a printed design requires deep knowledge of CMYK, paper stocks, and printing techniques.</p>
<p>HTML/CSS are certainly not convenient for pixel precision.  However they do manage to be the first true multi-platform multi-media open content format that can be accessed by tens of thousands of different devices, can be used by both the deaf and the blind and all other populations.</p>
<p>That is no small achievement, and though many have proclaimed how much better they can do, no one has created an alternative that gained any traction whatsoever.  So, if you want to do web design, maybe you should actually learn how it works, rather than writing banal rants demonstrating your own ignorance and utter disregard for the people who actually created the future you are now enjoying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iPad Links: Monday, March 1, 2010 &#171; Mike Cane&#39;s iPad Test</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>iPad Links: Monday, March 1, 2010 &#171; Mike Cane&#39;s iPad Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-363</guid>
		<description>[...] Design: The broken web Input contexts: switching from mouse to keyboard The Future Of CSS Typography Still ignores [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Design: The broken web Input contexts: switching from mouse to keyboard The Future Of CSS Typography Still ignores [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie Hubbard</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Hubbard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Yes it IS still broken.  We have really pathetic tools today when we compare the precision desktop development tools provided in terms of layout nearly two decades ago before the web.  I think the problem has been the humongous overhead of being backwardly compatible, and the stagnant w3c group.  HTML 5 is not helpful IMO for what&#039;s the real problem.  How do we change what we have without affecting the internet/  I wrote a blog post about a potential solution that would keep us backwardly compatible, but allow us to move forward without having to start over.

http://wrongnotes.blogspot.com/2009/09/what-if-html-wasnt-top-dog.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it IS still broken.  We have really pathetic tools today when we compare the precision desktop development tools provided in terms of layout nearly two decades ago before the web.  I think the problem has been the humongous overhead of being backwardly compatible, and the stagnant w3c group.  HTML 5 is not helpful IMO for what&#8217;s the real problem.  How do we change what we have without affecting the internet/  I wrote a blog post about a potential solution that would keep us backwardly compatible, but allow us to move forward without having to start over.</p>
<p><a href="http://wrongnotes.blogspot.com/2009/09/what-if-html-wasnt-top-dog.html" rel="nofollow">http://wrongnotes.blogspot.com/2009/09/what-if-html-wasnt-top-dog.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This is MADNESS</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>This is MADNESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-361</guid>
		<description>THIS IS SEPARATING-CONTENT-FROM-PRESENTATIONLAND!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS SEPARATING-CONTENT-FROM-PRESENTATIONLAND!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by webstartupgroup</title>
		<link>http://www.entertainingcode.com/archives/the-broken-web/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by webstartupgroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.entertainingcode.com/?p=1098#comment-360</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by webstartupgroup [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by webstartupgroup [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
